I always find the lifecycle
of buildings fascinating, watching them change over time whether it is through
general wear-and-tear, or through retrofitting and refurbishment, but I do love
seeing the original character of buildings shining through its later layers of ‘make
up’. That was why I loved Brand’s Shearing
Layers chapter. Watching the documented changes to San Francisco’s Cliff
House was astonishing, especially how the building seems to diminish
architecturally with time, and thanks to the 1907 fire, having its original
character diminish as well.
![]() |
| Life span of architectural elements. Brand's 6 S's + architectural principles. |
Frank Duffy’s and
Brand’s four/six S’s are also very poetic and simple breakdowns of the main
(and ever-changing) components of architecture, although I do have to disagree
that the “site is eternal”; in these (and I know this may sound corny) environmentally-endangering
times, we can no longer say that ‘site is eternal’, as rising sea levels, droughts
and floods, pollution, and urban sprawl are changing the world’s landscape.
Instead, perhaps we can say that site may not be eternal, but human desires,
instincts and architectural principles
are (drawing on Murray Lane’s previous lecture). I agree with the rest of Brand’s
six S’s, as well as Duffy’s idea that we should think of buildings in a “time-laden
way” for adaptive and practical architectural solutions, but suggest the
addition of an overarching principle, or even as Brand briefly mentions, a
seventh S for ‘soul’.
![]() |
| The interlinking (and dependent) relationships between the Physical World and the Virtual World |
Maybe we also need to
add an eighth S for ‘Sustainability’ or for ‘Science’, to make room for new technologies.
Or even another S for ‘Social media’, like in Juha Vant Zelfde’s The Aspatial City, where cities could be
seen as virtual and emotional connections through networks and social services.
Seeing aerial images
of Boston and how it transformed in 120 years was also fascinating, yet it was
rather saddening to see many historical buildings removed to make way for
modern infrastructure. This made me think fondly of Brisbane (which we don’t get
to do very often) and how we still have some beautiful gems from our past
tucked away in our city. Although our history doesn’t date that far back, it is
still reassuring that with the huge population boom and expansion we
experienced, we’ve still kept some of our traditional and gorgeous buildings.
Well, some of them (don’t get me started on the Regency Theatre!).
![]() |
| http://www.daytours.com.au/info/tours_departing_from//brisbane/ |
![]() |
| http://bill-mybrisbane.blogspot.com.au/2010_06_01_archive.html |
|
| http://waltzingaustralia.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/brisbanearchit-b.jpeg |
![]() |
| http://www.moviemem.com/blog/ |
My hope for the future
is that we’ll still maintain our respect for older buildings and although some
of them are atrocious now (and they probably make up 75% of our city!), they
may come to mean something to future generations – or perhaps our gun-ho nature
to building in the 1980’s should be removed from our future to save our
children the visual horrors they created.





No comments:
Post a Comment